jeudi 23 septembre 2021

The United-States Special Special Envoy to Haiti Daniel Foute Resigns in Disgust (this title is from Haiti Connexion Network)

Google Translater for Website

Click on the dropdown button to translate.

Translate this page:

You can translate the content of this page by selecting a language in the select box.

Vous pouver traduire cet article dans la langue de votre choix dans la case de selection

US Envoy to Haiti Resigns, Citing Political Intervention and “Inhumane” Deportation Policy

By Jake Jhonston



 Jake Johnston is a Senior Research Associate at the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C.

READ FULL BIO


Exactly two months after his appointment, Dan Foote has submitted his resignation as United States Special Envoy to Haiti, citing a “deeply flawed” US policy toward the nation that includes continued political intervention and the administration’s recent decision to ramp up deportations. “I will not be associated with the United States inhumane, counterproductive decision to deport thousands of Haitian refugees,” Foote wrote in his resignation letter, which was sent to Secretary of State Antony Blinken on September 22.

 The resignation comes as the Biden administration pushes forward with one of the largest mass expulsions of asylum seekers in decades. At least 12 flights have transported an estimated 1,400 individuals from Texas to Haiti in the past four days, and such flights are expected to nearly double throughout the week. The Biden administration has pledged to totally close the Del Rio, Texas border camp, where some 14,000 people had gathered last week hoping to apply for asylum in the United States. Though the administration has stated it is prioritizing single adults for deportation, flight manifests show that a significant portion of those sent to Haiti are families with young children.

The head of Haiti’s migration office, Jean Negot Bonheur Delva, has personally called for a moratorium on the flights. Delva, however, said the government was not in a position to make a formal request. “We need to understand that this is a relationship between a big and a small country,” he told the Washington Post.

Daniel Foute

 The administration is facing increasing criticism from influential figures within the Democratic party, including Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate leader Chuck Schumer. While the NAACP as well as many human rights organizations have denounced the anti-Black treatment of refugees witnessed at the southern border. Earlier in the week, border patrol agents on horseback charged at individuals and in some cases seemed to brandish their reins as whips.

“The events that took place yesterday are all too familiar to those that are aware of America’s ugly history,” NAACP President and CEO Derrick Johnson wrote, urging supporters to take action. 

“It is no secret that Haiti – the first Black republic – has been severely punished by western powers for centuries. This latest incident is nothing short of adding insult to injury.” -- NAACP President and CEO Derrick Johnson.

The Haitian Bridge Alliance and Human Rights First noted this was the latest in a long history of discriminatory behavior toward Haitians seeking safety in the US.

 Foote, the former special envoy, did not just have harsh words for the administration’s immigration policy, however. Writing that his recommendations had been ignored or misrepresented to superiors, he called the general US policy approach to Haiti “deeply flawed.”

 In his resignation letter, Foote connects the broader migration crisis to US policy in Haiti. While Haiti needs security and humanitarian assistance, “what our Haitian friends really want, and need, is the opportunity to chart their own course, without international puppeteering and favored candidates but with genuine support for that course,” Foote writes. “I do not believe that Haiti can enjoy stability until her citizens have the dignity of truly choosing their own leaders fairly and acceptably.”

 Foote had been appointed to help oversee a review of US policy in Haiti following pressure from members of Congress. “For decades, the international community has invested hundreds of millions of dollars to help Haiti achieve political stability and a representative democracy. In order to move forward more productively, we must acknowledge that these efforts have failed to achieve their desired results, and that continuing along the same path will only exacerbate the situation,” 68 members of Congress, led by Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Gregory Meeks, wrote in April of this year. “We believe it is past time for a more significant review of U.S. policy in Haiti. We look forward to working with you to make this a reality,” the members wrote, urging the appointment of a special envoy.

 From undermining Haitian farmers with cheap food imports to overturning election results and helping to overthrow governments, the US bears significant responsibility for the conditions in Haiti that so many are seeking to flee. As Brian Concannon, the director of Project Blueprint, wrote in the Miami Herald, 

“The United States has been destabilizing Haiti — and generating refugees — since the country emerged from a slave revolt in 1804 into a world run by slaveholding countries that felt threatened by the example of successful, self-emancipated Black people." -- Brian Concannon

 But it appears Foote did not find support within the administration for such a break from past policy. While Foote does not specify who did not agree with his recommendations, it has been clear since his appointment that he and US Ambassador to Haiti Michele Sison have rarely been on the same page. Multiple sources in Haiti have reported receiving mixed messages from the two US diplomats and have been unclear about who was really in charge of US policy.

 Secretary of State Blinken appointed Foote to the position two weeks after the assassination of President Jovenel Moïse. In the wake of Moïse’s death, the US  and other nations that make up the “Core Group” of foreign representatives in Haiti, along with the UN, threw their weight behind Dr. Ariel Henry as prime minister. Henry had been appointed by Moïse but had yet to take office or form a cabinet at the time of the assassination. Foote’s first trip to Haiti came just days after Henry’s assumption of the position.

 Last week the Core Group issued yet another statement in support of Henry and his efforts to reach a political agreement. In his resignation letter, Foote makes clear his opposition to this decision. The Core Group has “continued to tout [Henry’s] ‘political agreement’ over another broader, earlier accord shepherded by civil society,” he writes. “The hubris that makes us believe we should pick the winner — again – is impressive.”

The US, while voicing support for a broad-based dialogue that includes civil society, has largely refused to engage with the Civil Society Commission for a Haitian Solution to the Crisis, which has been meeting with a broad array of organizations for many months, even before the president’s assassination, in an effort to seek a Haitian-led path forward. Henry’s internationally-backed efforts to reach his own accord was seen as a direct effort to undermine the commission’s work.

 “This cycle of international political interventions in Haiti has consistently produced catastrophic results,” Foote concludes, again linking US policy to the root causes of migration. “More negative impacts to Haiti will have calamitous consequences not only in Haiti, but in the US and our neighbors in the hemisphere.” 

Google Translater for Website

Click on the dropdown button to translate.

Translate this page:

 Exactly two months after his appointment, Dan Foote has submitted his resignation as United States Special Envoy to Haiti, citing a “deeply flawed” US policy toward the nation that includes continued political intervention and the administration’s recent decision to ramp up deportations. “I will not be associated with the United States inhumane, counterproductive decision to deport thousands of Haitian refugees,” Foote wrote in his resignation letter, which was sent to Secretary of State Antony Blinken on September 22. 

The resignation comes as the Biden administration pushes forward with one of the largest mass expulsions of asylum seekers in decades. At least 12 flights have transported an estimated 1,400 individuals from Texas to Haiti in the past four days, and such flights are expected to nearly double throughout the week. The Biden administration has pledged to totally close the Del Rio, Texas border camp, where some 14,000 people had gathered last week hoping to apply for asylum in the United States. Though the administration has stated it is prioritizing single adults for deportation, flight manifests show that a significant portion of those sent to Haiti are families with young children. 

The head of Haiti’s migration office, Jean Negot Bonheur Delva, has personally called for a moratorium on the flights. Delva, however, said the government was not in a position to make a formal request. “We need to understand that this is a relationship between a big and a small country,” he told the Washington Post

The administration is facing increasing criticism from influential figures within the Democratic party, including Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate leader Chuck Schumer. While the NAACP as well as many human rights organizations have denounced the anti-Black treatment of refugees witnessed at the southern border. Earlier in the week, border patrol agents on horseback charged at individuals and in some cases seemed to brandish their reins as whips

“The events that took place yesterday are all too familiar to those that are aware of America’s ugly history,” NAACP President and CEO Derrick Johnson wrote, urging supporters to take action. “It is no secret that Haiti – the first Black republic – has been severely punished by western powers for centuries. This latest incident is nothing short of adding insult to injury.” The Haitian Bridge Alliance and Human Rights First noted this was the latest in a long history of discriminatory behavior toward Haitians seeking safety in the US. 

Foote, the former special envoy, did not just have harsh words for the administration’s immigration policy, however. Writing that his recommendations had been ignored or misrepresented to superiors, he called the general US policy approach to Haiti “deeply flawed.” 

In his resignation letter, Foote connects the broader migration crisis to US policy in Haiti. While Haiti needs security and humanitarian assistance, “what our Haitian friends really want, and need, is the opportunity to chart their own course, without international puppeteering and favored candidates but with genuine support for that course,” Foote writes. “I do not believe that Haiti can enjoy stability until her citizens have the dignity of truly choosing their own leaders fairly and acceptably.” 

Foote had been appointed to help oversee a review of US policy in Haiti following pressure from members of Congress. “For decades, the international community has invested hundreds of millions of dollars to help Haiti achieve political stability and a representative democracy. In order to move forward more productively, we must acknowledge that these efforts have failed to achieve their desired results, and that continuing along the same path will only exacerbate the situation,” 68 members of Congress, led by Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Gregory Meeks, wrote in April of this year. “We believe it is past time for a more significant review of U.S. policy in Haiti. We look forward to working with you to make this a reality,” the members wrote, urging the appointment of a special envoy. 

From undermining Haitian farmers with cheap food imports to overturning election results and helping to overthrow governments, the US bears significant responsibility for the conditions in Haiti that so many are seeking to flee. As Brian Concannon, the director of Project Blueprint, wrote in the Miami Herald, “The United States has been destabilizing Haiti — and generating refugees — since the country emerged from a slave revolt in 1804 into a world run by slaveholding countries that felt threatened by the example of successful, self-emancipated Black people.

But it appears Foote did not find support within the administration for such a break from past policy. While Foote does not specify who did not agree with his recommendations, it has been clear since his appointment that he and US Ambassador to Haiti Michele Sison have rarely been on the same page. Multiple sources in Haiti have reported receiving mixed messages from the two US diplomats and have been unclear about who was really in charge of US policy. 

Secretary of State Blinken appointed Foote to the position two weeks after the assassination of President Jovenel Moïse. In the wake of Moïse’s death, the US  and other nations that make up the “Core Group” of foreign representatives in Haiti, along with the UN, threw their weight behind Dr. Ariel Henry as prime minister. Henry had been appointed by Moïse but had yet to take office or form a cabinet at the time of the assassination. Foote’s first trip to Haiti came just days after Henry’s assumption of the position.

Last week the Core Group issued yet another statement in support of Henry and his efforts to reach a political agreement. In his resignation letter, Foote makes clear his opposition to this decision. The Core Group has “continued to tout [Henry’s] ‘political agreement’ over another broader, earlier accord shepherded by civil society,” he writes. “The hubris that makes us believe we should pick the winner — again – is impressive.”

The US, while voicing support for a broad-based dialogue that includes civil society, has largely refused to engage with the Civil Society Commission for a Haitian Solution to the Crisis, which has been meeting with a broad array of organizations for many months, even before the president’s assassination, in an effort to seek a Haitian-led path forward. Henry’s internationally-backed efforts to reach his own accord was seen as a direct effort to undermine the commission’s work. 

“This cycle of international political interventions in Haiti has consistently produced catastrophic results,” Foote concludes, again linking US policy to the root causes of migration. “More negative impacts to Haiti will have calamitous consequences not only in Haiti, but in the US and our neighbors in the hemisphere.” 

dimanche 12 septembre 2021

Crise des gangs au Nigéria : des lettres au lieu de téléphones portables et d'Internet

Google Translater for Website

Click on the dropdown button to translate.

Translate this page:

You can translate the content of this page by selecting a language in the select box.

Vous pouver traduire cet article dans la langue de votre choix dans la case de selection


NDLR:Les compagnies d'Internet et de téléphones portables (DIGICEL, NATCOM ou autres) pourraient-elles aider Haiti à résoudre la crise des gangs et des kidnappings entravant le développement d'Haïti ? Peut-être!

Au Nigéria où il existe aussi une crise du même genre, l'Intenet et les portables sont pratiquement coupés dans les fiefs des gangs rendant quotidiennment  la vie dure aux nigériens paisibles comme Haiti. Le raisonnement: enlever aux membres de ces bandes armées des moyens tactiques voire stratégiques de communications au cours desquelles elles planifient leurs forfaits, les lettres remplaçant les portables en ce qui concerne les zones affectées du Nigéria. Des vivres et autres produits alimentaires leurs sont aussi coupés, selon l'article d'en bas.

Comme c'est aussi évoqué dans l 'article ci-dessous, il y a des  pros et des cons  (bons et mauvais résultats) dans la mise en place de ces mesures (policières) qui peuvent sembler drastiques aux yeux de certains. Aux grands maux, les grands remèdes dit l'adage. A la société haitienne de savoir si elle veut  en finir avec la crise des gangs qui causent des sanglots en son sein.

Vous pouvez traduire l'article en français en choisissant la langue dans la case ci-contre.


Nigeria Gangs Crisis: letters instead of mobile phones and Internet 

In our series of letters from African journalists, Mannir Dan Ali, former editor-in-chief of Nigeria's Daily Trust newspaper, considers the impact of the latest tactic to tackle Nigeria's ruthless kidnapping gangs - cutting off access to mobile phones and the internet.
For the last few years life in rural areas of north-western Zamfara state has been agonisingly brutish.

Gun-toting motorbike gangs have made the state of approximately 15,352 sq miles (39,761 sq km) - an area bigger than countries like Burundi, Lesotho and Rwanda - a haven for wanton killing, rape and kidnapping for ransom.
The gang members are devious and well organised, often wearing military fatigues to confuse villagers as they come under attack.

This problem, which has festered for years, has now spread to at least five neighbouring states.
Various initiatives have been tried in Zamfara to end their reign of terror, including:
■   An amnesty for repentant gang members
■   A no-fly zone - imposed amid allegations that helicopters were delivering arms to the bandits
■   And a ban on mining after it was suspected gold was being used to fund the kidnappers.
But these measure have not made much difference, so the Zamfara authorities have now banned the movement and sale of animals, along with the weekly markets where farmers and business people go to trade. Stealing animals is one of the gangs' main streams of income.

The more drastic measure has been switching off all of Zamfara's 240 mobile phone towers.
The aim is to deny the criminals the means of communication with their informants and of negotiating ransoms with the families of those abducted.
A sustained air and ground operation has also been launched.

The phone blackout - which also affects communities on Zamfara's borders with other states - comes at a huge cost to families and businesses.
Simple things that could be done with just a call now need a whole day's trip to achieve.
Some are resorting to writing letters. Without a functioning postal system, these are being delivered via commercial buses that still travel between towns in the state and to other parts of the country.

A Zamfara-born resident of the capital, Abuja, told me that it has been unbearable not knowing if his family was safe.
It was only when a relation arrived in Abuja a few days ago that he received an update on their wellbeing.

Another told me that he was so worried, he will be travelling back to Zamfara soon to check up on his family.

Gangs 'driven elsewhere'

In spite of the difficulties caused by the phone shutdown, discussions on radio talk shows in Abuja are supportive of the measure.
One native of the state based in the capital said it was far better to endure a short period of pain rather than the daily mayhem that has turned Zamfara into one big jungle where armed men rule.

For now there is a near information blackout from Zamfara on how operations against the criminals are going.

Even journalists have no means of ascertaining the true state of affairs.
One reporter told me that she has been trying to convince the authorities to allow her to embed with troops.

More on Nigeria's kidnap crisis:
■   WATCH: Kidnappers demand millions for a child's life
■   ANALYSIS: Outrage at Nigeria's brazen bandit attacks
■   EXPLAINER: The motorcycle bandits terrorising Nigeria

Anecdotal reports suggest some degree of success in dislodging the gangs from their hideouts in forested areas.
However, more worryingly, this has been said to have driven them to neighbouring areas like Katsina, where I was born.

There has been a spike in abductions there in the last week, including that of the children of a local notable and that of a retired federal civil servant alongside his 15-year-old daughter.
I personally chose to move my mother away from her home recently - and just a few days ago, three university students were abducted less than a kilometre from her house.
Many security analysts argue that the current push, with all its pains, should have been a simultaneous operation in all the six states affected, so that the criminals would have no room for escape.
Most agree that only a joined-up approach will end the nightmare.

Source: BBC

Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica

More Letters from Africa:
■   Viewpoint: Why Twitter got it wrong in Nigeria
■   'If I don't pay they'll come for my kidney'
■   Drugs, dates and disputes at mules' border crossing
■   The true cost of Kenya's political love triangle
■   How Zimbabwe is still haunted by Robert Mugabe
Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica

vendredi 10 septembre 2021

Nouvelle Constitution pour Haïti?

Google Translater for Website

Click on the dropdown button to translate.

Translate this page:

You can translate the content of this page by selecting a language in the select box.

Vous pouver traduire cet article dans la langue de votre choix dans la case de selection

PORT-AU- PRINCE, HAITITI - Le gouvernement haïtien a publié ce mercredi 8 septembre 2021 un projet de nouvelle constitution et a de nouveau promu l'idée qu'une telle réforme est nécessaire alors que le pays reste embourbé dans la crise depuis l'assassinat du président Jovenel Moise.

 "Une nouvelle constitution ne serait pas une panacée pour résoudre tous nos problèmes", a déclaré le Premier ministre Ariel Henry.  "Mais si nous parvenons à nous mettre d'accord sur cette manière d'organiser la gouvernance de manière plus équilibrée et efficace, ce sera un point de départ pour d'autres accords sur l'avenir de notre pays."

PM Ariel Henry
 Les politiciens haïtiens et les citoyens ordinaires sont profondément divisés sur la façon dont leur nation pauvre et sujette aux catastrophes devrait être gérée en ce moment, alors qu'elle tente de se remettre du meurtre de Moise dans sa résidence le 7 juillet.

 Le gouvernement formé après l'assassinat, dirigé par Henry, souhaite la tenue d'élections générales dès que possible, tandis que l'opposition affirme qu'il devrait y avoir un gouvernement de transition pendant deux ans.

 Outre les élections législatives - qui auraient dû avoir lieu en 2018 mais ont été retardées - et les élections présidentielles, le gouvernement veut faire passer une réforme constitutionnelle que Moise avait déjà commencée.

 La nouvelle charte renforcerait les pouvoirs du président, au détriment du parlement.

 Il supprimerait le poste de Premier ministre et créerait une vice-présidence, qui serait pourvue en même temps que le président en un seul tour de scrutin.

 Un tel arrangement est conçu pour aider Haïti à éviter l'impasse à laquelle il est douloureusement habitué pour faire avancer les choses : maintenant, chaque fois qu'il y a un nouveau gouvernement, le parlement doit approuver l'agenda politique du Premier ministre, et cela est toujours lié à un débat sans fin  parmi les législateurs.

 Les défenseurs de la nouvelle constitution affirment qu'elle aiderait à lutter contre le problème chronique de la corruption en facilitant la tenue de procès devant les tribunaux ordinaires des représentants du gouvernement, des ministres et du président une fois qu'il ou elle quitte ses fonctions.

 Dans l'état actuel des choses, la procédure rarement utilisée pour juger de tels fonctionnaires est que la chambre basse du parlement porte des accusations et que le Sénat tienne un procès.

 « L'immunité n'est pas synonyme d'impunité », a déclaré Mona Jean, une avocate qui siège au comité qui a rédigé la nouvelle constitution.  "Un emploi gouvernemental ne doit pas être une source d'enrichissement illicite."

 Henry n'a pas précisé comment il pense que la nouvelle constitution devrait être votée.

 Moise avait proposé un référendum, prévu par l'administration électorale pour le 7 novembre, mais l'idée s'est avérée controversée, les critiques affirmant qu'elle viole la constitution actuelle.

 Il a été rédigé en 1987 après la chute de la dictature des Duvalier et interdit « toute consultation populaire visant à modifier la constitution par voie de référendum ».

Le premier ministre Ariel Henry est lui-même embrouillé dans l’enquête sur l’assassinat du président Moïse. Son nom est cité dans un rapport du RNDDH comme étant l’une des personnes qui avaient été en contact au téléphone même au cours de l’assassinat avec Joseph Félix Badio - un ancien employé gouvernemental en fuite - que la Police haïtienne accuse d’être un acteur principal dans l’assassinat de Moïse. Les analystes se demandent donc  si Henry (un neurochirurgien de profession) ne devrait pas démissionner de son poste pour se soumettre à l’intérogatoire du commissaire du gouvernement en charge de l’instruction de l ‘enquête sur l’assassinat.

 De son côté, Henry joue les rôles du sapeur-pompier, pacificateur et bon gars qui appelle à l’unité et la bonne gouvernance du pays. Il veut aussi “justice” pour le président assassiné. Henry a été nommé premier ministre par Moïse avant son assassinat mais il n’a jamais été assermenté. On ne sait pas encore comment il va s’y prendre pour organiser le vote sur la nouvelle constitution.
 A suivre.

Sources combinées

Featured Post

EDUCATION EN HAITI

 STATUT: ABSENSE DES ENSEIGNANTS BATIMENTS DELABR É S INSECURIT É NAN